• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Go to Positive Money Europe
  • Go to Positive Money US

Positive Money

Making money and banking work for society

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • History & highlights
    • Contact us
    • Current vacancies
    • In the media
    • Funding & Annual Reports
  • What we do
    • Educate & empower
    • Research and Policy
    • Campaign & local groups
    • Influence decision makers
    • In the media
    • International Movement
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Publications
    • Local group resources
    • Lobby your MP
    • Organise an Event
    • Policy resources
    • Shop
  • Press
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Positive Money Europe
  • Positive Money US

Chancellor Sajid Javid continues to defend secrecy over Bank of England appointment

by David Clarke

In September, Positive Money coordinated a joint letter from a cross-party group of MPs calling on the government to publish the shortlist of candidates to be the next Bank of England governor. We argued that doing so would ensure greater public trust in the appointment process.

The letter received widespread media attention and has now prompted public responses from the current governor Mark Carney, and chancellor Sajid Javid who both agreed the shortlist should remain secret.

In a letter to Catherine West MP, which we’re publishing today, the chancellor defended his decision, saying that ‘scrutiny in advance of the appointment stage must be proportionate’, and that there is a need to consider the potential for ‘destabilising speculation within financial markets associated with this decision’. 

Javid also points to the ‘established practice’ of candidates being able to apply in confidence. It’s true that in the past, this decision has been made behind closed doors. But past precedent has not prevented other powerful financial institutions from modernising. Just as the World Bank and IMF now publish the shortlist of candidates for their top jobs in a bid to increase transparency, the appointment process for the Bank of England governor should be updated to reflect the significant expansion of the Bank’s powers over the last decade.

As our letter makes clear, the shortlist should only be revealed after the candidates’ consent has been sought. The names of those being considered is already subject to leaks and media speculation; for example, the BBC reported last week the government had settled on former deputy governor and LSE director Minouche Shafik as its preferred candidate, while the FT was told that several candidates are still in the frame. 

It would be much fairer on those involved to publish this information as part of a formal process, rather than have their names released by anonymous sources at the Treasury. It would also give the public greater confidence that the decision is being made in an equitable and orderly way.

Mark Carney was asked whether the shortlist should be made public during his most recent hearing with the Treasury Select Committee. Although he didn’t express support for the idea, he did point out that parliament is unable to veto the government’s choice for his successor, whereas the appointment of the chair of the US central bank; the Federal Reserve, is subject to democratic approval by Congress.

Our recent paper ‘Seeking Legitimacy: a new settlement for the Bank of England’ envisages a greater role for the Treasury Select Committee in the appointment process. This would include allowing the committee to comment publicly on the shortlist of candidates prior to appointment, helping to ensure that the government considers a broad range of candidates with different backgrounds and perspectives.

This is just one part of a range of measures we believe are needed to improve the Bank’s democratic legitimacy and accountability. We’ve shared the report with all political parties ahead of the general election, and will continue to champion the report’s recommendations once the new government takes office.

Bank of England & QE, Campaigns, Parliament & Legislation, Power & Democracy, Updates accountability, Bank of England, monetary policy, transparency, Treasury Select Committee

David Clarke

Head of Policy and Advocacy, Positive Money

David leads Positive Money’s influencing programme, encompassing political engagement and media relations.

Primary Sidebar

Get our latest campaign updates

Recent Posts

  • Inheritance: the Gatekeeper of the Housing Crisis
  • An opportunity to stop the privatisation of money with a digital pound
  • Home is where the mind is: How the housing crisis is impacting our mental wellbeing (and how to fix it)
  • May interest rate rise: Positive Money response
  • A People’s Panel on the Cost of Living

Footer

Follow us on social media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


Privacy Policy, Terms & Conditions


Positive Money is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales. Registered number 07253015.
Registered office: 104 Davina House, 137-149 Goswell Road, London EC1V 7ET.


Positive Money Europe