• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Go to Positive Money Europe

Positive Money

Making money and banking work for society

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • History & highlights
    • Contact us
    • There are currently no vacancies available
    • In the media
    • Funding & Annual Reports
  • What we do
    • Educate & empower
    • Research and Policy
    • Campaign & local groups
    • Influence decision makers
    • In the media
    • International Movement
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Publications
    • Local group resources
    • Lobby your MP
    • Organise an Event
    • Policy resources
    • Shop
  • Press
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Positive Money Europe

Why central banks perform worse than they could, and why sovereign-money reform would help to perform much better

by Positive Money

Central banks do in fact have some power, but much less than is commonly thought, writes Prof Joseph Huber in his new paper entitled Monetary Puzzlement.

Screen Shot 2014-12-31 at 16.38.26Here’s a short extract:

Central banks’ basic mission is to be guardians of sound money and stable currencies. They are supposed to achieve this by:

  • running an efficient cashless payment system, including domestic and foreign
  • transactions, as well as providing cash as long as cash is part of the stock of money
  • providing liquidity to banks
  • managing the foreign exchange value of their currency if need be
  • managing the domestic purchasing power of the money, that is, the inflation rate, either
    • a) by exerting control over the quantity of money or
    • b) by implementing interest-rate policy
  • overseeing banks’ liquidity and solvency position, for which central banks have now also been made responsible (and which is controversial in view of the already existing supervisory and regulatory agencies).

Central banks are commonly believed to be able to fulfill these tasks. As will be seen, central banks do in fact have some power, but much less than is commonly thought. The predominant monetary power is the banks rather than the central bank. So too it is the banking industry rather than the central banks that is to be blamed for the recurrent crises, even though the activities of a country’s banks and the national central bank are intertwined.

Read more here or download as a PDF.

 

 

 

 

 

Bank of England & QE, Economic Analysis, Theory

Positive Money

Primary Sidebar

Get our latest campaign updates

Recent Posts

  • Big win: New green mandate for the Bank of England
  • Quantitative easing “turbocharges” inequality: our evidence to the House of Lords
  • Surprise for Sunak: 60,000 demand climate action on frontpage of his local paper
  • QE or not to QE? Soaring inequality shows it’s time for a new macroeconomic approach
  • Update from Chair of the Board on Interim Leadership

Footer

Follow us on social media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


Privacy Policy, Terms & Conditions


Positive Money is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales. Registered number 07253015.
Registered office: 307 Davina House, 137-149 Goswell Road, London EC1V 7ET.


Positive Money Europe