Written by Positive Money on October 14, 2014. Tweet Martin Wolf, Chief Economics Commentator of Financial Times speaks at the event “Does Money Grow on Trees?” at the hall of the Institute for Chartered Accountants on 9th September 2014. Watch the presentation (32 min): “Why should we let such a social creation [money] be handed over to profit-seeking private enterprises?” Watch the following panel discussion (23 min): Speakers: Martin Wolf, Chief Economics Commentator, Financial Times Alderman Alison, GowmanPartner, DLA Piper Frosti Sigurjónsson, Member of Parliament, Iceland Ben DysonFounder, Positive Money Michael Izza, Chief Executive, ICAEW Stay in touch Please enter your name. Please check your email is valid. not in the UK? AfghanistanÅland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBolivia, Plurinational State ofBonaire, Sint Eustatius and SabaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCongo, the Democratic Republic of theCook IslandsCosta RicaCôte d”IvoireCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Faroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)HondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIran, Islamic Republic ofIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKorea, Democratic People”s Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People”s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarRéunionRomaniaRussian FederationRwandaSaint BarthélemySaint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da CunhaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Martin (French part)Saint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint Maarten (Dutch part)SlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwanTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet NamVirgin Islands, BritishVirgin Islands, U.S.Wallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabwe Please wait a few seconds while we take you to the next step… We send news updates and videos fortnightly and keep your data private. Unsubscribe with single click. Trackback from your site. Andrew Seems to have be pretty heavy theoretical stuff, can hear lot of great ideas, but can’t quite honestly keep attention with such a monotone voice, can we get a transcript of Mr. Wolf’s speech? kavadias I could not understand the point of Mr. Wolf in the last panel discussion question. What was the alternative to a bail-in in a case a state cannot bail-out the banks? What was Geithner’s take on this, to which Mr. Wolf refers to? Let the system melt down? Meaning take all the hit in the present (stand back watching banks forced to liquidate assets, until prices fall sufficiently in the sector involved in the bubble) and not let the state spread it in a longer run? And how is this going to avoid bank defaults (and runs) and the associated full bail-in? Definitely, this has to be done in a controlled way, so that only people that had invested in the sector(s) causing the bubble would take the hit, and the rest of the bank can be kept alive and associated deposits safe… JamieWalton77 Mr Wolf’s point was that in a large bust in a large country, the government of that country would not allow a bail-in, instead, they would do whatever it takes to preserve the deposits of the banking system, and he alluded that this is what Mr. Geithner writes in his book also. http://www.khavariforgovernor.com Farid Khavari https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN-iQd-F-zc&feature=youtu.be Polymath How is the Positive Money proposal fundamentally different from the Public Banking solution? It still achieves the same positive result in the end. Less tax, less debt and more money. It’s sovereign money in both cases. JamieWalton77 Question: How is the Positive Money proposal fundamentally different from the Public Banking solution? Answer: The Positive Money proposal adds money to the economy without adding debt to the economy, whereas the “Public Banking solution” only adds money to the economy by adding more debt to the economy, which is the problem that needs to be solved, so obviously not part of the solution – i.e., the “Public Banking solution” is not a solution at all; it’s part of the problem. I hope that’s clear to everyone. Polymath Then why does North Dakota, the only state with a state owned bank, have the lowest debt burden throughout the US? The interest is recycled back into the productive economy. I don’t doubt, however, that Positive Money is the optimal method. Howard The BND does not participate in the fractional reserve system but operates as a 100% reserve bank as the Chicago Plan required and Milton Friedman advocated long ago, which keeps them on solid economic footing. But this does not solve the problem, that is just one part of the 3 part solution. http://www.khavariforgovernor.com Farid Khavari http://www.opednews.com/articles/Why-commercial-banks-shoul-by-Farid-Khavari-Banks_Capitalism_College_Credit-140317-810.html OurParty How is allowing the Government to have control over the creation of money something to the left? Does he think Cameron would spend extra Government funds on anything other than war? This worry is precisely why PM want a transparent body, similar to the MPC, to create the money according to a cross party agreed protocol.